Once again, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the four liberal members of the Supreme Court in making a controversial decision. I recall when Roberts was testifying before the Senate, he described the job of a Justice as the "calling of balls and strikes." That approach dd not last very long. Recall that when he sided with the four liberal Justices in upholding the ACA (Obamacare), Roberts saw fit to rewrite the law to accomplish the goal of upholding its constitutionality. Although the law clearly stated that people would pay a "penalty" for failing to buy insurance, Roberts felt that a penalty for inaction could not be upheld under the Commerce Clause. Therefore, and notwithstanding the language of the statute and the comments by Obama calling it a penalty, Roberts found a way to uphold the law by calling the "penalty" a "tax," and upholding the ACA as part of the government's taxing power. Roberts rewrote the law in order to uphold its constitutionality. Of course, the four liberal justices were willing to uphold the law by calling the payment a "penalty" or "tax" or anything else.
Prior to signing his executive order on DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), Obama expressed his opinion that, as President, he had no authority to act alone on immigration matters. "I am not king. I can't do these things just by myself." And, with "respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations, through executive order, that's just not the case." Further: "I can't just bypass Congress and change the law myself...that's not how a democracy works." Of course, then he went ahead and did it on his own anyway. When Trump's Acting Secretary of Homeland Security declared that DACA was unlawful (as Obama even said before he did it), the Supreme Court said that was not good enough. Roberts, in writing the majority opinion, claimed that the Court was not deciding "whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies." Right.
Then why does Roberts tell us that these DACA individuals "enrolled in degree programs, embarked on careers, started businesses, purchased homes and even married and had children" based on the protections afforded by the DACA order. Roberts also discussed the economic consequences of rescinding DACA; and said the Homeland Security Secretary's failure to consider these issues made the Trump order "arbitrary and capricious." At this point I have no desire to uproot hundreds of thousands of people brought here illegally by their parents. But let's be honest. The issues that Roberts addressed are all within the purview of the Congress - not within an executive order, and certainly not within the power of a Court that is supposed to call "balls and strikes." As Justice Thomas said in his dissent: "The decision to rescind an unlawful agency action is per se lawful." And let's be clear about something else - lawlessness breeds lawlessness.
"Where does it stop?" That is what President Trump asked in 2017 with, at first, confederate statues being taken down. "I wonder, is it George Washington next week. And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after?" Many of us asked the same questions. Now we know. After three weeks of protests in Portland, down came statues of both Jefferson and Washington. We will need to remove their names from the history books. We will need to rename Washington, D.C., our nation's capital. In London, someone defaced the base of Winston Churchill's statue, saying Churchill "was a racist." The BBC News reports that Churchill expressed beliefs in the superiority of certain races. But so what? Do we overlook the fact that Churchill, along with FDR and Stalin, led the fight to defeat the greatest racist and anti-Semite in history? These people protesting some of these statues are children, even if not chronologically so. Because they expect perfection in those we honor; and the standards by which they judge people are by today's standards, ignoring the times in which they lived. These naive people (children) expect perfection in people as they do in a society. The US is not perfect, so the US is no good. I would say to these people: Grow up!
Larry Elder, a conservative talk radio host and author, made a video discussing the idea of "systemic racism." Elder is black. You want to get ahead, get into the middle class? It's simple, said Elder. Three simple steps towards the middle class. 1. Finish high school. 2. Get a full time job. 3. Do not have kids before age 21. These findings were supported by both the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, and the Brookings Institute, a liberal think tank.
Apparently, the "summer of love" in the CHOP (formerly the CHAZ) in Seattle is not going as well as the idiot Mayor suggested. Two people were shot, including a 19 year old who died from his injuries. When a group of police officers attempted to enter the CHOP they were forced back by a much larger crowd of protesters. The Mayor has forbid the use of tear gas to disperse large crowds. The first job of government is protect the people they serve. The Mayor and Governor appear to be unwilling to do that. They should be prosecuted for willful neglect of their duties by the United States Attorney in Washington, and removed from their respective offices.
The most popular police show(s) ever are the various "Law & Order" series. Starting with the original "Law & Order," to "Law & Order - Criminal Intent," to now the longest running show of the series, "Law & Order - Special Victims Unit." Mariska Hargitay, playing Olivia Benson, started as a detective in the SVU, but eventually moved up to Captain, and now runs the unit. But Rolling Stone magazine is not happy. Bad cops are no good - we can all agree on that. But good cops are no good either. Rolling Stone: "No matter how much you love Olivia Benson, you have to be willing to grapple with the fact that she plays a major role in perpetuating the idea that cops are inherently trustworthy and heroic...and that many viewers are unable to distinguish between the gossamer fantasy of how justice should be handled, and how it actually is." Typical elitism.
The Rolling Stone knows what's best for viewers, because the average person is unable to figure out real life on their own. I can only imagine what these people would say about "Father Knows Best," "The Donna Reed Show," "Ozzie and Harriet," or "The Cosby Show."
Susan Rice was Obama's Ambassador to the UN, and National Security Adviser. She is a contender for Biden's VP. She said this election was about removing Trump and getting Biden in the White House, and "consign(ing) those who supported him (Trump) in the Senate to the trash heap of history." So, Trump supporters are garbage. As happens with some frequency, Rice's son does not share her politics. He supports Trump, and was the President of the Stanford College Republicans. But Rice tells us: "we have made a very conscious decision to put what binds us - our love as a family, our history, our aspirations, far above our political and policy differences." Now, if she only felt the same way about her fellow Americans.
Some numbers. The latest week's unemployment numbers had 1,508,000 more people applying for benefits. The result is a 13 week total of 45,740,000 claims. I no longer know what to even say about that. A Gallup Poll (reported by CNN) found that only 42% of the respondents said they were "extremely proud" to be an American. Party differences were substantial, with 67% of Republicans being extremely proud, but only 24% of Democrats feeling extremely proud to be an American. In another poll by Fox, people were asked what is motivating them to vote for their candidate for president. Among Biden supporters, 63% said it was fear of Trump winning, with only 31% voicing enthusiasm for their candidate. But for Trump supporters it was the reverse, as 62% were enthusiastic in supporting him, with only 33% saying they were motivated by the fear of Biden winning.
The latest numbers (as of last night) showed a total of 2,300,000 cases of coronavirus in the US, with 121,000 deaths. New York had 387,000 cases and 24,710 deaths. California moved into second place with 169,000 (plus 3,893 new cases) and 5,424 deaths (plus 64 new fatalities). Then New Jersey with 169,000 cases and 12,857 deaths, Illinois with 136,000 cases and 6,625 deaths, and Texas with 108,000 cases and 2,165 deaths. Los Angeles County had 81,636 cases and 3,110 deaths, continuing to far exceed what might be expected based on the county's percentage of the state's population.
And, to end with a feel good story. This is out of London. A black man at a BLM protest carried a white man to safety, rather than let the surrounding mob beat the man. He and four other protesters surrounded the man so that he could be carried to safety. Said the hero: "We did what we had to do. We stopped somebody from being killed." He went on to say that if the three cops standing around George Floyd did the same thing, Floyd would be alive today. Amen to that.
Sunday, June 21, 2020
Sunday, June 14, 2020
The Coronavirus Thirteen Weeks Later - Welcome to the CHAZ
There was an interesting piece in the New York Times by their Seattle bureau chief, Mike Baker, discussing the newly formed "Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ)," that part of Seattle taken over by protesters either supporting, or part of, the Black Lives Matter movement. I hasten to add that CHAZ is now CHOP, although there does not appear to be a consensus as what the "O" stands for. I have seen "Capitol Hill Occupied Protest" and "Capitol Hill Organized Protest." Whatever, it is an approximate six block area of Seattle that the police have abandoned, with one banner over the now abandoned police station reading: "This space is now the property of the Seattle people." Is it now? The banner is reminiscent of a friend's favorite scene from Dr. Zhivago. When the good doctor returns to his home/mansion, after tending to wounded troops during the Russian Revolution, he finds that his home has been taken over by "the people."
Baker tells us: "The entire area was now a homeland for racial justice." Not so much for women, apparently, as the police declared there were reports of rapes (and robberies) in the CHAZ/CHOP. But no matter. Baker: "What has emerged is an experiment in life without police - part street festival, part commune. Hundreds have gathered to hear speeches, poetry and music." Said one occupier: "We are trying to prove through action and practice that we don't need them (police) and we can fulfill the community needs without them." Interesting that these protesters felt the need to put up barricades (a wall? like Trump's wall?) to control ingress and egress to and from the CHAZ/CHOP. And, lo and behold, there were armed people controlling the ingress and egress. Hmmm. Border Police?
I have a question. When did the people who live in, and own businesses in, the CHAZ/CHOP get to vote on this new arrangement? Did I miss the reporting of those election results? Or, as with the Communists in 1917 - "Election? We ain't got no election. We don't got to show you no stinking election." (Okay, I know. Now I'm mixing Dr. Zhivago with Treasure of the Sierra Madre.) But the Mayor of Seattle, Jenny Durkan, had no problem with the CHAZ/CHOP, as she said: "Lawfully gathering and expressing First Amendment rights, demanding we do better as a society, and providing true equity for communities of color is not terrorism. It is patriotism." One woman living in the CHAZ/CHOP did not see things the same way: "I've lived on Capitol Hill for thirty years. The amount of graffiti, the amount of trash, the lack of respect to the small businesses that were here, it breaks my heart." Whiner.
Here is a Tweet from Her Honor, the Moron, I mean Mayor: "The Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone #CHAZ is not a lawless wasteland of anarchist insurrection - it is a peaceful expression of our community's collective grief and their desire to build a better world." Just to be clear, according to the Mayor, any group that is grieving and desires a better world, can take over pretty much whatever they want? As I said, moron. Besides, the Chief of Police did not exactly agree with the Mayor. Chief Carmen Best: "Rapes, robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we're not able to get to (them)." I think that the Chief is missing the big picture, because, you know, the "speeches, poetry and music."
One reporter from Fox noted that 500 people live in the CHAZ/CHOP, with another 15 to 20 businesses in the area. Sadly, all but a couple of businesses were boarded up. But who cares about the business owners and their employees, when people are listening to "speeches, poetry and music." As Tom Bevan, president and co-founder of Real Clear Politics, said: "If a bunch of MAGAs took over a section of Seattle and declared their independence, the media would lose their marbles. And you know Jay Inslee (the Governor of Washington) would be preening in front of the cameras declaring a statewide emergency instead of pretending he knew nothing about it." (Two days into the CHAZ, Inslee claimed not to have heard about it.)
Meanwhile, it is easy to forget that we are in the midst of a presidential election year. The election is less than five months away, but with the coronavirus we have not seen the usual travel on the campaign trail. I would like to see at least three debates between Trump and Biden. One on domestic policy, one on foreign policy and one open to questions from average people. After the Democrats' attempted coup at removing Trump from office, it is quite amazing to see the lies being told by Biden about Trump and the election. In April, Biden said this: "This president, mark my words, I think he's going to try to kick back the election somehow, come up with a rationale why it can't be held." Really? Based on what, Joe? But this is what Biden said just a few days ago: "My single greatest concern - this president's going to try and steal this election." Again, how would he do that, Joe? Ballots are counted at the local level. These are the same types of lies the media and the Dems have been saying about Trump since he took office - he's a dictator. Except, as previously shown in the May 24 post (The Coronavirus Ten Weeks Later - Back to Politics) it was Obama who regularly acted contrary to the Constitution.
But let us not forget how Biden went after Mitt Romney during the 2012 campaign. While speaking to a largely black audience, and mocking Romney's idea of less regulations on banks, Biden said "unchain Wall Street?" "They're going to put y'all back in chains." Columnist Jonah Goldberg described Romney as a "transparently decent man." But that did not stop the Dems and the mainstream media from viciously attacking him. Goldberg: "The lesson many on the right took from all the Romney attacks was that a candidate can't win by being decent. 'At least he fights' became a kind of unofficial mantra of the Trump brigades." Which is not to say that President Trump has never disappointed me. My biggest disappointment during this turmoil is his failure to speak to the nation (not just on Twitter) and try to be a unifying voice when the country needs it.
Earlier this week it was reported that another 1.5 million people applied for unemployment benefits in the preceding week. That brought the 12 week total to 44.1 million people. As the country has begun reopening, there has been a spike in coronavirus cases, especially in the southern and western states. But I believe the pressure to stay open - both from businesses and the states themselves - will overcome the temptation to reintroduce another lock down.
The latest numbers I saw show the US has had a total of 2,150,772 cases of COVID 19, with 117,604 deaths. New York had 403,809 cases and 30,874 deaths. New Jersey 169,237 cases and 12,696 deaths; California 150,267 cases and 5,062 deaths; Illinois 131,871 cases and 6,289 deaths; and Massachusetts 105,395 cases and 7,576 deaths. Pennsylvania is seventh with 83,210 cases but has had 6,283 deaths. And Michigan is ninth with 65,836 cases but 6,013 deaths.
On June 8, the Chicago Sun Times reported that, over the prior weekend, 85 people were shot in Chicago, and 24 people were killed. On May 31, Chicago had the single most deadly day in about six decades, with 18 people killed that day. So I ask: who is mourning for those people? Who is out protesting and marching? The article told us that one of those killed was a 30 year old black woman, and another was only 18 years old and was in a college prep program, while a third black woman was a college student. Where is the outrage? We should all be outraged over these killings. But they were probably killed by other blacks. Cal Thomas had a piece on Fox in which he cited the FBI's crime data from 2018. He said that 2,925 blacks were murdered in the US that year, with blacks being the murderers about 2,600 times. Where is the outrage?
I will leave you all with this thought from the brilliant economist and thinker, Thomas Sowell: "Have we reached the ultimate stage of absurdity where some people are held responsible for things that happened before they were born, while other people are not held responsible for what they themselves are doing today?"
Baker tells us: "The entire area was now a homeland for racial justice." Not so much for women, apparently, as the police declared there were reports of rapes (and robberies) in the CHAZ/CHOP. But no matter. Baker: "What has emerged is an experiment in life without police - part street festival, part commune. Hundreds have gathered to hear speeches, poetry and music." Said one occupier: "We are trying to prove through action and practice that we don't need them (police) and we can fulfill the community needs without them." Interesting that these protesters felt the need to put up barricades (a wall? like Trump's wall?) to control ingress and egress to and from the CHAZ/CHOP. And, lo and behold, there were armed people controlling the ingress and egress. Hmmm. Border Police?
I have a question. When did the people who live in, and own businesses in, the CHAZ/CHOP get to vote on this new arrangement? Did I miss the reporting of those election results? Or, as with the Communists in 1917 - "Election? We ain't got no election. We don't got to show you no stinking election." (Okay, I know. Now I'm mixing Dr. Zhivago with Treasure of the Sierra Madre.) But the Mayor of Seattle, Jenny Durkan, had no problem with the CHAZ/CHOP, as she said: "Lawfully gathering and expressing First Amendment rights, demanding we do better as a society, and providing true equity for communities of color is not terrorism. It is patriotism." One woman living in the CHAZ/CHOP did not see things the same way: "I've lived on Capitol Hill for thirty years. The amount of graffiti, the amount of trash, the lack of respect to the small businesses that were here, it breaks my heart." Whiner.
Here is a Tweet from Her Honor, the Moron, I mean Mayor: "The Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone #CHAZ is not a lawless wasteland of anarchist insurrection - it is a peaceful expression of our community's collective grief and their desire to build a better world." Just to be clear, according to the Mayor, any group that is grieving and desires a better world, can take over pretty much whatever they want? As I said, moron. Besides, the Chief of Police did not exactly agree with the Mayor. Chief Carmen Best: "Rapes, robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we're not able to get to (them)." I think that the Chief is missing the big picture, because, you know, the "speeches, poetry and music."
One reporter from Fox noted that 500 people live in the CHAZ/CHOP, with another 15 to 20 businesses in the area. Sadly, all but a couple of businesses were boarded up. But who cares about the business owners and their employees, when people are listening to "speeches, poetry and music." As Tom Bevan, president and co-founder of Real Clear Politics, said: "If a bunch of MAGAs took over a section of Seattle and declared their independence, the media would lose their marbles. And you know Jay Inslee (the Governor of Washington) would be preening in front of the cameras declaring a statewide emergency instead of pretending he knew nothing about it." (Two days into the CHAZ, Inslee claimed not to have heard about it.)
Meanwhile, it is easy to forget that we are in the midst of a presidential election year. The election is less than five months away, but with the coronavirus we have not seen the usual travel on the campaign trail. I would like to see at least three debates between Trump and Biden. One on domestic policy, one on foreign policy and one open to questions from average people. After the Democrats' attempted coup at removing Trump from office, it is quite amazing to see the lies being told by Biden about Trump and the election. In April, Biden said this: "This president, mark my words, I think he's going to try to kick back the election somehow, come up with a rationale why it can't be held." Really? Based on what, Joe? But this is what Biden said just a few days ago: "My single greatest concern - this president's going to try and steal this election." Again, how would he do that, Joe? Ballots are counted at the local level. These are the same types of lies the media and the Dems have been saying about Trump since he took office - he's a dictator. Except, as previously shown in the May 24 post (The Coronavirus Ten Weeks Later - Back to Politics) it was Obama who regularly acted contrary to the Constitution.
But let us not forget how Biden went after Mitt Romney during the 2012 campaign. While speaking to a largely black audience, and mocking Romney's idea of less regulations on banks, Biden said "unchain Wall Street?" "They're going to put y'all back in chains." Columnist Jonah Goldberg described Romney as a "transparently decent man." But that did not stop the Dems and the mainstream media from viciously attacking him. Goldberg: "The lesson many on the right took from all the Romney attacks was that a candidate can't win by being decent. 'At least he fights' became a kind of unofficial mantra of the Trump brigades." Which is not to say that President Trump has never disappointed me. My biggest disappointment during this turmoil is his failure to speak to the nation (not just on Twitter) and try to be a unifying voice when the country needs it.
Earlier this week it was reported that another 1.5 million people applied for unemployment benefits in the preceding week. That brought the 12 week total to 44.1 million people. As the country has begun reopening, there has been a spike in coronavirus cases, especially in the southern and western states. But I believe the pressure to stay open - both from businesses and the states themselves - will overcome the temptation to reintroduce another lock down.
The latest numbers I saw show the US has had a total of 2,150,772 cases of COVID 19, with 117,604 deaths. New York had 403,809 cases and 30,874 deaths. New Jersey 169,237 cases and 12,696 deaths; California 150,267 cases and 5,062 deaths; Illinois 131,871 cases and 6,289 deaths; and Massachusetts 105,395 cases and 7,576 deaths. Pennsylvania is seventh with 83,210 cases but has had 6,283 deaths. And Michigan is ninth with 65,836 cases but 6,013 deaths.
On June 8, the Chicago Sun Times reported that, over the prior weekend, 85 people were shot in Chicago, and 24 people were killed. On May 31, Chicago had the single most deadly day in about six decades, with 18 people killed that day. So I ask: who is mourning for those people? Who is out protesting and marching? The article told us that one of those killed was a 30 year old black woman, and another was only 18 years old and was in a college prep program, while a third black woman was a college student. Where is the outrage? We should all be outraged over these killings. But they were probably killed by other blacks. Cal Thomas had a piece on Fox in which he cited the FBI's crime data from 2018. He said that 2,925 blacks were murdered in the US that year, with blacks being the murderers about 2,600 times. Where is the outrage?
I will leave you all with this thought from the brilliant economist and thinker, Thomas Sowell: "Have we reached the ultimate stage of absurdity where some people are held responsible for things that happened before they were born, while other people are not held responsible for what they themselves are doing today?"
Sunday, June 7, 2020
The Coronavirus Twelve Weeks Later - The Mob Rules
It has been quite a week of turmoil. Emotions, as they say, have been running high. But emotion without reason can result in bad things happening. And reason without compassion can lead to faulty logic and actions. Let me start with the obvious - again. The killing of George Floyd was horrible. We saw a police officer acting with no compassion for a fellow human being who could not breathe. In that moment, it was irrelevant that Mr. Floyd had a criminal history. The police were called because he was said to be passing a counterfeit twenty dollar bill - not a capital offense. Since that day, the mob - the left-wing politically correct mob - has been on the march.
Drew Brees is the long time quarterback for the New Orleans Saints. This is what got him in trouble with his fellow players: "I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of America or our country." He went on to acknowledge that the country has problems, but said that honoring the flag is a way to show "unity" and that "we are all in this together." But group think and group speak is required by the left, especially in this time of upheaval. Aaron Rodgers, quarterback for the Green Bay Packers attacked Brees: "It (taking a knee) has NEVER been about an anthem. Not then. Not now." Really? Then how come the only time I saw players kneel was during the playing of the national anthem? They weren't kneeling during halftime. Brees apologized. Twice. The pressure must have been too much. Shannon Sharpe, retired all-star, called the apology by Brees "meaningless." Sharpe said Brees "should just go ahead and retire now." Back in March, Brees and his wife said they were donating $5 million to provide 10,000 meals a day to help feed needy people throughout Louisiana. There is no doubt that many of those recipients are black. Yet, his fellow players did not come to his defense, and say he was a good man. I've said it before, if you don't adhere to the party line in your thoughts and speech, the left will come after you.
The New York Times published an Op-Ed by Republican Senator Tom Cotton. In the article, Cotton recommended sending in troops to quell the rioting going on across the country, and to help restore order. Many staffers at the Times Tweeted: "Running this puts Black @NYTimes staff in danger." How's that? The mere publishing of one man's opinion on the use of troops put their lives in danger? How? The Times, as could be expected, apologized to the left-wing mob. After initially defending the decision to publish the article, the Times said the article made it through a "rushed editorial process." And, to demonstrate the cowards that they are, not only did they apologize, they said they would reduce the number of Op-Eds in the future. Imagine that. A newspaper, often billed as the premier newspaper in the country, decided that less speech is better. So much for the First Amendment at the Times.
Kirsten Powers is a liberal opinion writer for the USA Today. In a recent Op-Ed she quoted her friend, Lisa Sharon Harper, a black woman, as follows: "The only course of action for white people now is repentance and repair." Is that group repentance? Does every white individual have to repent? For what exactly? Then Powers added: "I urge all white people to really search their conscience and take responsibility for how they benefited from not challenging white supremacy." Do whites who voted for Obama (which whites did in large numbers) also have to search their conscience and take responsibility? Or, is this all a ruse to persuade people to vote for democrats, who will follow the left-wing agenda? Do those of us who were born white now have to apologize for that?
Emily Watson is a white sociology professor at Dartmouth. She also had an Op-Ed in the USA Today, on 6/2/20. Walton: "All students should take an accessible course on race and ethnicity if racial equity is to be an achievable goal." If I thought taking a course would end racism, anti-Semitism and other religious and ethnic hatreds, I would be all for it. I am concerned, however, about the spin that a left-wing professor would put on it; and I fear such a class would quickly turn into an anti-American and anti-Israel class. After all, we know that many professors throughout the country are anti-Israel and anti-American. So, I think it is a reasonable concern.
Watson continued that white students must "understand that being a good person does not make them innocent but rather they, too, are implicated in a system of racial dominance." So, there you have it. Every white person, no matter how good, is bad. I would ask the professor if the blacks who have succeeded in this oppressive society owe repentance to poor whites who have not succeeded. I happen to think that being a good person is excellent. Think about it; what if every person lived by the Golden Rule (alternatively stated as "do unto others what you would like people to do to you," or "do not do to others that which you do not want done to you"). If officer Derek Chauvin was following the Golden Rule, Mr. Floyd would still be with us. If the people who were rioting, burning and looting followed the Golden Rule, they would not have done any of it, and many lives and businesses and jobs would have been saved. Just by being a good person.
Please do not mistake my comments for meaning that society cannot improve. No society, like no person, is perfect. But let's not start by attacking good people just because they are white. I'll take a good person of any race, religion or ethnicity over a white male Jew (such as myself) who is bad, any time.
Chad Sanders is a young black author. He had an Op-Ed online in the New York Times on 6/5/20. He started his piece with this: "My book is coming out in a few months, and I don't know if I'm going to be alive to see it, because I'm a black man." I truly feel bad for Mr. Sanders. The way the media depicts our society, I can understand why he might fear not living very long. But I have to ask. Does anyone, even those on the left, truly believe that the United States is engaging in a targeted genocide of blacks? While I will give some statistics, I truly encourage everyone to do their own research. If anyone finds evidence of mass genocide, a Holocaust, against black Americans, please forward the data to me.
Mr. Sanders then expresses his unhappiness with white friends: "many white people I know are spilling over with guilt and overzealous attempts to offer sympathy." He says: "Stop sending your thoughts." Instead he wants his white friends to: (1) give money to blacks running for office, or to legal defense funds for those unjustly arrested or imprisoned or killed. If I give money to black Republicans running for office, does that count? (2) He wants his white friends to text "relatives and loved ones telling them you will not be visiting them or answering phone calls until they take significant action in supporting black lives either through protest or financial contributions." I'm going to guess that Mr. Sanders is not religious, as he seems to be throwing out the biblical commandment of "honor thy father and mother." It is difficult to honor one's parents while ignoring them. Lastly, Mr. Sanders wants whites to (3) give protection "to fellow black protesters who are at greater risk of harm during demonstrations." I do not know if black demonstrators are at greater risk than whites, but what is he seeking? Vigilantism?
Some numbers. According to the site "Mapping Police Violence," which appears to be a left-wing site, police killed 1098 people in 2019. We are immediately told that, even though blacks were only 13% of the population, 24% of those killed by the police were black. That would be 263 (or 264) people. I could not immediately find the rate at which blacks commit crime within that article. Nor could I easily find the number of blacks who were killed in 2019 even though they were unarmed. Heather MacDonald reported in the 6/2/20 Wall Street Journal that in 2019 the police shot and killed 9 unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites. (Yes, not all killings done by the police are with the use of a gun. But this gives us some idea.) Politifact objected to those stats and said that as of June 3, 28 unarmed blacks and 51 unarmed whites were killed by the police. "Unarmed" included those with toy guns, BB guns, air soft guns and rocks. Ms. MacDonald also reported that, in 2018, blacks committed 53% of the murders and 60% of the robberies. That might account for blacks greater interaction with the police.
Here's a question. For those of you who can quickly recite the names of black people killed by the police in the recent past, can you name even three white people killed by the police recently? But if a black person is killed by a police officer, especially by a white police officer, that will be non-stop news all over the media. Then perception becomes reality, whether or not the numbers bear it out. Here's another stat - in 2019, 89 law enforcement officers were killed in the line of duty (per the FBI). Of those, 41 were accidental and 48 were from felonious acts. Of those 48, 7 were black, 1 was Asian and 40 were white. Again, none of this is to excuse the excessive use of force by police when it occurs. None of this is to excuse police who abuse the power they have been given. The purpose of this post is to try to give some balance.
In yet another Op-Ed in the USA Today, on 6/5/20, Kelly Lawler (a young white woman) bemoaned the number of cop shows on TV. Much of her beef seemed to be that the cops were always portrayed as the good guys. A couple of questions come to mind. Should they portray murderers and rapists as the good guys? If cops are portrayed as the bad guys, how might that affect young people's interactions with the police if they are stopped and/or arrested. I have seen plenty of movies where cops are portrayed as corrupt and evil. Some, like Serpico, are even based on true stories. But I fail to see the benefit of a weekly TV show where the bad guys either win, or the bad guys are the police. Remember, perception becomes reality.
Some more numbers. The numbers as of last night were 1,988,545 cases of coronavirus in the US, with 112,096 deaths. New York had 397,810 cases and 30,401 deaths, New Jersey 165,675 and 12,146 cases and deaths, California 128,947 and 4,624, Illinois 126,890 and 5,864, Massachusetts 103,132 and 7,289, and Pennsylvania 79,514 and 6,001. Los Angeles County as of last night had 62,338 cases and 2,620 deaths.
In the latest week's numbers an additional 1.9 million people filed for unemployment benefits. That brings the 11 week total to an astonishing 42.6 million people. On the good news front, the unemployment rate in May dipped to 13.3%, as the economy added 2.5 million jobs. That is certainly good news, as the economy starts to reopen from the pandemic.
Drew Brees is the long time quarterback for the New Orleans Saints. This is what got him in trouble with his fellow players: "I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of America or our country." He went on to acknowledge that the country has problems, but said that honoring the flag is a way to show "unity" and that "we are all in this together." But group think and group speak is required by the left, especially in this time of upheaval. Aaron Rodgers, quarterback for the Green Bay Packers attacked Brees: "It (taking a knee) has NEVER been about an anthem. Not then. Not now." Really? Then how come the only time I saw players kneel was during the playing of the national anthem? They weren't kneeling during halftime. Brees apologized. Twice. The pressure must have been too much. Shannon Sharpe, retired all-star, called the apology by Brees "meaningless." Sharpe said Brees "should just go ahead and retire now." Back in March, Brees and his wife said they were donating $5 million to provide 10,000 meals a day to help feed needy people throughout Louisiana. There is no doubt that many of those recipients are black. Yet, his fellow players did not come to his defense, and say he was a good man. I've said it before, if you don't adhere to the party line in your thoughts and speech, the left will come after you.
The New York Times published an Op-Ed by Republican Senator Tom Cotton. In the article, Cotton recommended sending in troops to quell the rioting going on across the country, and to help restore order. Many staffers at the Times Tweeted: "Running this puts Black @NYTimes staff in danger." How's that? The mere publishing of one man's opinion on the use of troops put their lives in danger? How? The Times, as could be expected, apologized to the left-wing mob. After initially defending the decision to publish the article, the Times said the article made it through a "rushed editorial process." And, to demonstrate the cowards that they are, not only did they apologize, they said they would reduce the number of Op-Eds in the future. Imagine that. A newspaper, often billed as the premier newspaper in the country, decided that less speech is better. So much for the First Amendment at the Times.
Kirsten Powers is a liberal opinion writer for the USA Today. In a recent Op-Ed she quoted her friend, Lisa Sharon Harper, a black woman, as follows: "The only course of action for white people now is repentance and repair." Is that group repentance? Does every white individual have to repent? For what exactly? Then Powers added: "I urge all white people to really search their conscience and take responsibility for how they benefited from not challenging white supremacy." Do whites who voted for Obama (which whites did in large numbers) also have to search their conscience and take responsibility? Or, is this all a ruse to persuade people to vote for democrats, who will follow the left-wing agenda? Do those of us who were born white now have to apologize for that?
Emily Watson is a white sociology professor at Dartmouth. She also had an Op-Ed in the USA Today, on 6/2/20. Walton: "All students should take an accessible course on race and ethnicity if racial equity is to be an achievable goal." If I thought taking a course would end racism, anti-Semitism and other religious and ethnic hatreds, I would be all for it. I am concerned, however, about the spin that a left-wing professor would put on it; and I fear such a class would quickly turn into an anti-American and anti-Israel class. After all, we know that many professors throughout the country are anti-Israel and anti-American. So, I think it is a reasonable concern.
Watson continued that white students must "understand that being a good person does not make them innocent but rather they, too, are implicated in a system of racial dominance." So, there you have it. Every white person, no matter how good, is bad. I would ask the professor if the blacks who have succeeded in this oppressive society owe repentance to poor whites who have not succeeded. I happen to think that being a good person is excellent. Think about it; what if every person lived by the Golden Rule (alternatively stated as "do unto others what you would like people to do to you," or "do not do to others that which you do not want done to you"). If officer Derek Chauvin was following the Golden Rule, Mr. Floyd would still be with us. If the people who were rioting, burning and looting followed the Golden Rule, they would not have done any of it, and many lives and businesses and jobs would have been saved. Just by being a good person.
Please do not mistake my comments for meaning that society cannot improve. No society, like no person, is perfect. But let's not start by attacking good people just because they are white. I'll take a good person of any race, religion or ethnicity over a white male Jew (such as myself) who is bad, any time.
Chad Sanders is a young black author. He had an Op-Ed online in the New York Times on 6/5/20. He started his piece with this: "My book is coming out in a few months, and I don't know if I'm going to be alive to see it, because I'm a black man." I truly feel bad for Mr. Sanders. The way the media depicts our society, I can understand why he might fear not living very long. But I have to ask. Does anyone, even those on the left, truly believe that the United States is engaging in a targeted genocide of blacks? While I will give some statistics, I truly encourage everyone to do their own research. If anyone finds evidence of mass genocide, a Holocaust, against black Americans, please forward the data to me.
Mr. Sanders then expresses his unhappiness with white friends: "many white people I know are spilling over with guilt and overzealous attempts to offer sympathy." He says: "Stop sending your thoughts." Instead he wants his white friends to: (1) give money to blacks running for office, or to legal defense funds for those unjustly arrested or imprisoned or killed. If I give money to black Republicans running for office, does that count? (2) He wants his white friends to text "relatives and loved ones telling them you will not be visiting them or answering phone calls until they take significant action in supporting black lives either through protest or financial contributions." I'm going to guess that Mr. Sanders is not religious, as he seems to be throwing out the biblical commandment of "honor thy father and mother." It is difficult to honor one's parents while ignoring them. Lastly, Mr. Sanders wants whites to (3) give protection "to fellow black protesters who are at greater risk of harm during demonstrations." I do not know if black demonstrators are at greater risk than whites, but what is he seeking? Vigilantism?
Some numbers. According to the site "Mapping Police Violence," which appears to be a left-wing site, police killed 1098 people in 2019. We are immediately told that, even though blacks were only 13% of the population, 24% of those killed by the police were black. That would be 263 (or 264) people. I could not immediately find the rate at which blacks commit crime within that article. Nor could I easily find the number of blacks who were killed in 2019 even though they were unarmed. Heather MacDonald reported in the 6/2/20 Wall Street Journal that in 2019 the police shot and killed 9 unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites. (Yes, not all killings done by the police are with the use of a gun. But this gives us some idea.) Politifact objected to those stats and said that as of June 3, 28 unarmed blacks and 51 unarmed whites were killed by the police. "Unarmed" included those with toy guns, BB guns, air soft guns and rocks. Ms. MacDonald also reported that, in 2018, blacks committed 53% of the murders and 60% of the robberies. That might account for blacks greater interaction with the police.
Here's a question. For those of you who can quickly recite the names of black people killed by the police in the recent past, can you name even three white people killed by the police recently? But if a black person is killed by a police officer, especially by a white police officer, that will be non-stop news all over the media. Then perception becomes reality, whether or not the numbers bear it out. Here's another stat - in 2019, 89 law enforcement officers were killed in the line of duty (per the FBI). Of those, 41 were accidental and 48 were from felonious acts. Of those 48, 7 were black, 1 was Asian and 40 were white. Again, none of this is to excuse the excessive use of force by police when it occurs. None of this is to excuse police who abuse the power they have been given. The purpose of this post is to try to give some balance.
In yet another Op-Ed in the USA Today, on 6/5/20, Kelly Lawler (a young white woman) bemoaned the number of cop shows on TV. Much of her beef seemed to be that the cops were always portrayed as the good guys. A couple of questions come to mind. Should they portray murderers and rapists as the good guys? If cops are portrayed as the bad guys, how might that affect young people's interactions with the police if they are stopped and/or arrested. I have seen plenty of movies where cops are portrayed as corrupt and evil. Some, like Serpico, are even based on true stories. But I fail to see the benefit of a weekly TV show where the bad guys either win, or the bad guys are the police. Remember, perception becomes reality.
Some more numbers. The numbers as of last night were 1,988,545 cases of coronavirus in the US, with 112,096 deaths. New York had 397,810 cases and 30,401 deaths, New Jersey 165,675 and 12,146 cases and deaths, California 128,947 and 4,624, Illinois 126,890 and 5,864, Massachusetts 103,132 and 7,289, and Pennsylvania 79,514 and 6,001. Los Angeles County as of last night had 62,338 cases and 2,620 deaths.
In the latest week's numbers an additional 1.9 million people filed for unemployment benefits. That brings the 11 week total to an astonishing 42.6 million people. On the good news front, the unemployment rate in May dipped to 13.3%, as the economy added 2.5 million jobs. That is certainly good news, as the economy starts to reopen from the pandemic.
Sunday, May 31, 2020
The Coronavirus Eleven Weeks Later - The George Floyd Story Dominates The News
It was difficult to watch. In Minneapolis, a video showed a white police officer kneeling on the neck of George Floyd, a black man, as Floyd was laying face down on the ground. Pleading he could not breathe, the officer continued to kneel on his neck for over 8 minutes. Mr. Floyd died. Within four days the officer was charged with third degree murder under Minnesota law. It did not take long for the demonstrations to turn violent, with looting, burning and rioting in the streets of many cities across the country.
People of all races and all political persuasions were disgusted by what happened to Mr. Floyd. People of good will have also felt revulsion at the looting and burning and rioting. Burning and looting of businesses have nothing to do with happened to Mr. Floyd. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said the protests were 'the result of so much built up anger and sadness." Frey: "If you're feeling that sadness, that anger, it's not only understandable, it's right. It's a reflection of the truth that our black community has lived." Well, Mr. Frey, you did not condemn the rioting and looting. And you neglected to say how that sadness, that anger, might be directed in a positive way. That was your job as Mayor.
Atlanta's Mayor is a black woman by the name of Keisha Lance Bottoms. Here is what she said about the looters and rioters: "You're not honoring the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement...when you burn down this city, you're burning down our community." And: "You are disgracing this city, you are disgracing the life of George Floyd and every other person who has been killed in this country."
It was reported that Minnesota's Governor received a call from a State Senator, complaining that her district was "on fire, no police, no firefighters, no social control, constituents locked in houses wondering what they were going to do." I watched in astonishment as a Minneapolis police station was attacked by a mob, and saw the police abandon the station and the neighborhood, as they drove away in one police cruiser after the next. I could not make a better argument for the right to keep and bear arms - no police, and a mob run amok. I also saw, after the state police and national guard were called out and were on the streets, continued looting and rioting. Did no one care about those shop owners whose stores were being damaged and destroyed?
Chrissy Teigen pledged $200,000 to bail out protesters who had been arrested. I was not impressed. It would have said far more if she had donated that money to minority owners of shops whose businesses were destroyed. And LeBron James Tweeted: "Why doesn't America Love US!!!!!????TOO." Does Mr. James really believe that most Americans carry a hatred of their fellow Americans who are black? No one is claiming there are not bad cops. No one is claiming that there is not racism. But just as Jews were murdered in a synagogue in Pittsburgh, and at a Chabad House in Poway, California, and even though Jews remain by far the number one target of religious hate crimes, I do not believe that America is a fundamentally anti-Semitic country. Can we do better? Clearly. Do police need better training? Apparently. But let's not condemn every police officer; let's not condemn the entire country.
The agenda-driven New York Times ran with this headline online on 5/30/20: "What Top Conservatives Are Saying About George Floyd and Police Brutality." The implication, of course, is that conservatives were reluctant to criticize the white police officer who killed Mr. Floyd. Which is a total lie. People across the political spectrum were disgusted by what they saw. The Times: "The chilling circumstances of Mr. Floyd's death - particularly the graphic, indisputable video of his arrest - have, at least for now posed a political quandary among some conservative politicians, media stars and President Trump, whose usual instinct is to focus on blaming liberals for promoting lawlessness." A political quandary? What rubbish. But they do make a good point about how some left-wing mayors and governors are willing to look the other way when it's left-wing inspired violence. Recall in 2015, following the death of Freddie Gray, the Baltimore Mayor instructed the police to not only give space to peaceful protesters, but "we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well."
Another week and another 2.1 million people applied for unemployment. That gives us a ten week total of 40,767,000 people unemployed. A friend told me of eating at an opened restaurant and talking with the female server he knew. During the lock down, her mother died and the longtime family dog died. As a single mother of three she needed to work. But the restaurant could only afford to give her 20 hours a week. That day, this server only had two tables that were occupied when my friend and his wife were in - theirs and one other. The other table left a minimal tip, which my friend and his wife made up for with theirs. But there are 40 million of these stories.
The latest numbers as of last night were 1,816,820 cases in the US, with 105,557 deaths. New York had 378,951 cases and 29,829 deaths, New Jersey 160,916 cases and 11,637 deaths, Illinois 118,917 cases and 5,330 deaths, California 109,883 cases and 4,213 deaths, Massachusetts 96,301 cases and 6,768 deaths, and Pennsylvania 75,794 cases and 5,560 deaths. Later in the evening last night I saw that California had 110,100 cases and 4,214 deaths. Newly reopened Los Angeles County had 53,651 cases and 2,338 deaths. Now, however, with multiple cities in LA County suffering from rioting, the entire County is under a curfew from 6 p.m. Sunday through 6 a.m. Monday.
People of all races and all political persuasions were disgusted by what happened to Mr. Floyd. People of good will have also felt revulsion at the looting and burning and rioting. Burning and looting of businesses have nothing to do with happened to Mr. Floyd. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said the protests were 'the result of so much built up anger and sadness." Frey: "If you're feeling that sadness, that anger, it's not only understandable, it's right. It's a reflection of the truth that our black community has lived." Well, Mr. Frey, you did not condemn the rioting and looting. And you neglected to say how that sadness, that anger, might be directed in a positive way. That was your job as Mayor.
Atlanta's Mayor is a black woman by the name of Keisha Lance Bottoms. Here is what she said about the looters and rioters: "You're not honoring the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement...when you burn down this city, you're burning down our community." And: "You are disgracing this city, you are disgracing the life of George Floyd and every other person who has been killed in this country."
It was reported that Minnesota's Governor received a call from a State Senator, complaining that her district was "on fire, no police, no firefighters, no social control, constituents locked in houses wondering what they were going to do." I watched in astonishment as a Minneapolis police station was attacked by a mob, and saw the police abandon the station and the neighborhood, as they drove away in one police cruiser after the next. I could not make a better argument for the right to keep and bear arms - no police, and a mob run amok. I also saw, after the state police and national guard were called out and were on the streets, continued looting and rioting. Did no one care about those shop owners whose stores were being damaged and destroyed?
Chrissy Teigen pledged $200,000 to bail out protesters who had been arrested. I was not impressed. It would have said far more if she had donated that money to minority owners of shops whose businesses were destroyed. And LeBron James Tweeted: "Why doesn't America Love US!!!!!????TOO." Does Mr. James really believe that most Americans carry a hatred of their fellow Americans who are black? No one is claiming there are not bad cops. No one is claiming that there is not racism. But just as Jews were murdered in a synagogue in Pittsburgh, and at a Chabad House in Poway, California, and even though Jews remain by far the number one target of religious hate crimes, I do not believe that America is a fundamentally anti-Semitic country. Can we do better? Clearly. Do police need better training? Apparently. But let's not condemn every police officer; let's not condemn the entire country.
The agenda-driven New York Times ran with this headline online on 5/30/20: "What Top Conservatives Are Saying About George Floyd and Police Brutality." The implication, of course, is that conservatives were reluctant to criticize the white police officer who killed Mr. Floyd. Which is a total lie. People across the political spectrum were disgusted by what they saw. The Times: "The chilling circumstances of Mr. Floyd's death - particularly the graphic, indisputable video of his arrest - have, at least for now posed a political quandary among some conservative politicians, media stars and President Trump, whose usual instinct is to focus on blaming liberals for promoting lawlessness." A political quandary? What rubbish. But they do make a good point about how some left-wing mayors and governors are willing to look the other way when it's left-wing inspired violence. Recall in 2015, following the death of Freddie Gray, the Baltimore Mayor instructed the police to not only give space to peaceful protesters, but "we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well."
Another week and another 2.1 million people applied for unemployment. That gives us a ten week total of 40,767,000 people unemployed. A friend told me of eating at an opened restaurant and talking with the female server he knew. During the lock down, her mother died and the longtime family dog died. As a single mother of three she needed to work. But the restaurant could only afford to give her 20 hours a week. That day, this server only had two tables that were occupied when my friend and his wife were in - theirs and one other. The other table left a minimal tip, which my friend and his wife made up for with theirs. But there are 40 million of these stories.
The latest numbers as of last night were 1,816,820 cases in the US, with 105,557 deaths. New York had 378,951 cases and 29,829 deaths, New Jersey 160,916 cases and 11,637 deaths, Illinois 118,917 cases and 5,330 deaths, California 109,883 cases and 4,213 deaths, Massachusetts 96,301 cases and 6,768 deaths, and Pennsylvania 75,794 cases and 5,560 deaths. Later in the evening last night I saw that California had 110,100 cases and 4,214 deaths. Newly reopened Los Angeles County had 53,651 cases and 2,338 deaths. Now, however, with multiple cities in LA County suffering from rioting, the entire County is under a curfew from 6 p.m. Sunday through 6 a.m. Monday.
Sunday, May 24, 2020
The Coronavirus Ten Weeks Later (Part II) - Back to Politics
Yes, Joe Biden actually said to a black man: "If you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black." Yes, he did apologize afterwards. But so what? He could not have said, or even thought of, something like that unless he actually believed it. And they tell us that Republicans are the racists. But it is not just Biden. There are blacks who agree. And there are Jews who do not understand how I, a Jew, can vote Republican. Frankly, it is racist group think.
Meanwhile, over in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz formed a unity government, after 3 elections produced no clear winner. As part of their unity agreement there was discussion of Israel "annexing" parts of the West Bank. However, 18 US Senators, all Democrats and including two Jews, sent a letter to Netanyahu and Gantz, objecting to annexation. "As friends and supporters of Israel, we caution you against taking unilateral steps that would fray our unique bonds, imperil Israel's future and place out of reach the prospect of a lasting peace." Some friends these Democrats are. I don't need friends threatening me.
Instigating the letter were Senators Chris Murphy, Connecticut, Tim Kaine, Virginia, and Chris Van Hollen, Maryland. Also signing the letter were these Senators: Dick Durbin, Elizabeth Warren (who may be Biden's running mate as VP), Tammy Duckworth, Sherrod Brown, Tammy Baldwin, Patrick Leahy, Jeff Merkley, Tom Udall, Sheldon Whitehouse, Ed Markey, Martin Heinrich, Jeanne Shaheen and Tom Carper. I have discussed in many prior posts Israel's right to "occupy" and even "annex" part of the West Bank (Judea and Samaria). I will simply point out here that the Jordan River valley must always remain under Israeli control, lest outside forces (think Iran, Al Qaeda and ISIS) are mere minutes away from Israel's greatest population centers. Furthermore, applying Israeli sovereignty to the 500,000 Jews living across the 1949 armistice lines, makes clear that those people are part of the State of Israel.
The Dems are not taking any chances. In the event that Donald Trump wins reelection, they have put impeachment back on the table. Really. In their recent arguments to get the Supreme Court to order the release of the Mueller investigation's grand jury testimony, the Democrats argued they have an "ongoing presidential impeachment investigation," which they describe as part of their "weighty constitutional responsibility." Essentially, they were on a fishing expedition, and argued that new material may lead to new articles of impeachment. These people are disgusting. They never accepted their 2016 defeat, and it is clear they have no intention of accepting another defeat. (It is worth rereading the March 12, 2017 post (less than 2 months after Trump's inauguration) called "The Deposing of an American President.")
After acting DNI Rick Grenell ordered the release of Omama Administration officials' testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, we learned what a farce the entire Russian collusion story was. James Clapper, Obama's DNI: "I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting or conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election." Obama's National Security Adviser, Susan Rice: "I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence." Obama's Attorney General, Loretta Lynch: "I do not recall that being briefed up to me." Then we have Evelyn Farkas, Obama's Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia, who desperately sought to distribute as much information as possible about the incoming Administration of Donald Trump: "I didn't know anything." Then Congressman Trey Gowdy specifically asked her: "You also didn't know whether or not anybody in the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia, did you?" Farkas: "I didn't." And all the while Democratic Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, was telling the American people he had definitive evidence of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
The Justice Department decided to drop their prosecution of Michael Flynn, after it became clear that it was a set-up. The FBI agents who interviewed him did not think he was lying. But an FBI memo made clear, when asking what the goal was - "get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired?" Obama was unable to refrain from commenting on the DOJ dropping its prosecution of Michael Flynn: "That's the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic - not just institutional norms - but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk." Please. How sad that so many Dems actually believe that Obama was squeaky clean. But here is the real story.
As David Hirsanyi wrote in the 5/12/20 National Review: "By 2016, the Obama administration's intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama's Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA Director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files. His attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist...The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a "massive and unprecedented intrusion." He further explains: "Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of members of Congress who opposed the Iran nuclear deal." Not to mention Obama's use of the IRS to target conservative groups.
But Obama is worried about the rule of law? And Trump is the threat to democracy? I've got the London Bridge for sale, if you're interested.
Meanwhile, over in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz formed a unity government, after 3 elections produced no clear winner. As part of their unity agreement there was discussion of Israel "annexing" parts of the West Bank. However, 18 US Senators, all Democrats and including two Jews, sent a letter to Netanyahu and Gantz, objecting to annexation. "As friends and supporters of Israel, we caution you against taking unilateral steps that would fray our unique bonds, imperil Israel's future and place out of reach the prospect of a lasting peace." Some friends these Democrats are. I don't need friends threatening me.
Instigating the letter were Senators Chris Murphy, Connecticut, Tim Kaine, Virginia, and Chris Van Hollen, Maryland. Also signing the letter were these Senators: Dick Durbin, Elizabeth Warren (who may be Biden's running mate as VP), Tammy Duckworth, Sherrod Brown, Tammy Baldwin, Patrick Leahy, Jeff Merkley, Tom Udall, Sheldon Whitehouse, Ed Markey, Martin Heinrich, Jeanne Shaheen and Tom Carper. I have discussed in many prior posts Israel's right to "occupy" and even "annex" part of the West Bank (Judea and Samaria). I will simply point out here that the Jordan River valley must always remain under Israeli control, lest outside forces (think Iran, Al Qaeda and ISIS) are mere minutes away from Israel's greatest population centers. Furthermore, applying Israeli sovereignty to the 500,000 Jews living across the 1949 armistice lines, makes clear that those people are part of the State of Israel.
The Dems are not taking any chances. In the event that Donald Trump wins reelection, they have put impeachment back on the table. Really. In their recent arguments to get the Supreme Court to order the release of the Mueller investigation's grand jury testimony, the Democrats argued they have an "ongoing presidential impeachment investigation," which they describe as part of their "weighty constitutional responsibility." Essentially, they were on a fishing expedition, and argued that new material may lead to new articles of impeachment. These people are disgusting. They never accepted their 2016 defeat, and it is clear they have no intention of accepting another defeat. (It is worth rereading the March 12, 2017 post (less than 2 months after Trump's inauguration) called "The Deposing of an American President.")
After acting DNI Rick Grenell ordered the release of Omama Administration officials' testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, we learned what a farce the entire Russian collusion story was. James Clapper, Obama's DNI: "I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting or conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election." Obama's National Security Adviser, Susan Rice: "I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence." Obama's Attorney General, Loretta Lynch: "I do not recall that being briefed up to me." Then we have Evelyn Farkas, Obama's Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia, who desperately sought to distribute as much information as possible about the incoming Administration of Donald Trump: "I didn't know anything." Then Congressman Trey Gowdy specifically asked her: "You also didn't know whether or not anybody in the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia, did you?" Farkas: "I didn't." And all the while Democratic Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, was telling the American people he had definitive evidence of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
The Justice Department decided to drop their prosecution of Michael Flynn, after it became clear that it was a set-up. The FBI agents who interviewed him did not think he was lying. But an FBI memo made clear, when asking what the goal was - "get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired?" Obama was unable to refrain from commenting on the DOJ dropping its prosecution of Michael Flynn: "That's the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic - not just institutional norms - but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk." Please. How sad that so many Dems actually believe that Obama was squeaky clean. But here is the real story.
As David Hirsanyi wrote in the 5/12/20 National Review: "By 2016, the Obama administration's intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama's Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA Director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files. His attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist...The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a "massive and unprecedented intrusion." He further explains: "Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of members of Congress who opposed the Iran nuclear deal." Not to mention Obama's use of the IRS to target conservative groups.
But Obama is worried about the rule of law? And Trump is the threat to democracy? I've got the London Bridge for sale, if you're interested.
The Coronavirus Ten Weeks Later - the States Start to Reopen
In the week ending on 5/16/2020, another 2.4 million people applied for unemployment benefits. That brings the 9 week total to 38.6 million people unemployed. I do not even know what to say anymore. On Fox they were talking about bread/food lines in New York City. On the other hand, NBC reported that Walmart and Target combined made $10 billion more online and in stores in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the same quarter in 2019. Unfortunately, small business revenue was down by 75%.
Meanwhile, many counties in California have been given the okay to partially reopen. Mall stores that have curbside access can reopen. Dining in restaurants is permitted again - assuming they maintain social distancing between the tables, as well as other safety measures. As I expected, partial opening seemed to mean to many people "back to normal." We have seen young people standing in a group right next to one another, outside of a local Starbucks. We have seen similar non-social distancing on TV. In an AP/NORC poll, conducted 5/14-5/18, 69% of Republicans said they would likely go to reopened restaurants, compared to 37% of Democrats. There was less of a disparity with regards to retail shopping - 82% of Republicans were likely to go, compared to 61% of Democrats. The margin of error for the poll was +/- 4.2%.
Dr. Mark Siegel reported on an interesting study by JP Morgan, as reported by Yael Halon on Fox. "States and countries where lockdowns were implemented have had a higher rate of COVID-19 cases than locations that remained open throughout the pandemic." Dr. Siegel: "Locking down destroys our health care system to the point where we have more heart attacks that are not going to the hospital now, more strokes that are not going to the hospital now. More cancer that is not being screened. People say they are afraid to go to the emergency room right now."
Meanwhile, we continue to see a struggle between the federal government and certain local governments. President Trump was particularly concerned about houses of worship not being allowed to reopen when retail outlets were. Trump: "I call upon governors to allow our churches and places of worship to open right now. If they don't do it, I will override the governors." While I agree that houses of worship should be allowed to reopen if they can maintain the same safety protocols that restaurants and retail stores must abide by, I do not agree that the President has the authority to override the governors. General police powers are reserved to the states. And, I am not a fan of the heavy hand of the federal government interfering with state actions, absent a clear violation of federal law.
The DOJ was also threatening both LA City and LA County. In a letter to Mayor Garcetti and the County's Director of Public Health, the DOJ wrote: "Reports of your recent public statements indicate that you suggested the possibility of long-term lockdown of the residents in the City and County of Los Angeles, regardless of the legal justification for such restrictions...Any such approach may be both arbitrary and unlawful." Again, I am not convinced of either the legitimacy or the appropriateness of federal interference with states, counties and cities, absent a violation of federal law.
Speaking of the heavy hand of the federal government, it was recently reported that Lori Laughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, decided to plead guilty in connection with their actions related to the college admissions scandal. The allegation is that the couple paid $500,000 to Rick Singer in order to get their daughters admitted to the University of Southern California. Laughlin pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, and in exchange for the plea is to serve 2 months in prison, pay a fine of $150,000, and perform 100 hours of community service. Her husband pleaded guilty to the same charges, plus honest services wire and mail fraud, in exchange for a 5 month prison term, a fine of $250,000 and 250 hours of community service. I am not sure why the different charges and punishment. But that's not my beef.
What bothers me is that, having committed the act of bribery (through Singer), and falsifying their daughters' involvement in sports, they faced up to 50 years in prison if they went to trial and were convicted on all counts. 50 years in prison for trying to get their daughters admitted to USC? That is outrageous. They were not accused of terrorism or mass murder or running a drug cartel. But, because the feds are able to allege their actions violate various federal laws, each carrying lengthy prison terms, they dared not risk a trial. I am not defending this couple's actions - but I am objecting to the fact that what is essentially a single act can violate numerous laws, allowing the Feds to threaten what amounts to life in prison. What if they were innocent? Could anyone take the risk of a 50 year prison sentence? It is not an answer to say they are only getting 2 and 5 months respectively. Not when the threat of 50 years hangs over their heads.
As of today, the latest numbers I saw showed that the US had 1.68 million cases of coronavirus, with 98,011 deaths. New York and New Jersey combine to have 30.5% of the total cases in the US (360,000 and 153,000, respectively), and 35% of the total deaths (23,282 and 11,081, respectively). Next is Illinois with 108,000 cases and 4,790 deaths, Massachusetts with 91,662 cases and 6,304 deaths, and California with 90,631 cases and 3,708 deaths. LA County, with a quarter of the state's population, had 49.6% of the state's cases (44,988) and 56.7% of the state's deaths (2,104). So, who is to say who knows better on reopening LA? Ultimately, it appears the people will decide.
Meanwhile, many counties in California have been given the okay to partially reopen. Mall stores that have curbside access can reopen. Dining in restaurants is permitted again - assuming they maintain social distancing between the tables, as well as other safety measures. As I expected, partial opening seemed to mean to many people "back to normal." We have seen young people standing in a group right next to one another, outside of a local Starbucks. We have seen similar non-social distancing on TV. In an AP/NORC poll, conducted 5/14-5/18, 69% of Republicans said they would likely go to reopened restaurants, compared to 37% of Democrats. There was less of a disparity with regards to retail shopping - 82% of Republicans were likely to go, compared to 61% of Democrats. The margin of error for the poll was +/- 4.2%.
Dr. Mark Siegel reported on an interesting study by JP Morgan, as reported by Yael Halon on Fox. "States and countries where lockdowns were implemented have had a higher rate of COVID-19 cases than locations that remained open throughout the pandemic." Dr. Siegel: "Locking down destroys our health care system to the point where we have more heart attacks that are not going to the hospital now, more strokes that are not going to the hospital now. More cancer that is not being screened. People say they are afraid to go to the emergency room right now."
Meanwhile, we continue to see a struggle between the federal government and certain local governments. President Trump was particularly concerned about houses of worship not being allowed to reopen when retail outlets were. Trump: "I call upon governors to allow our churches and places of worship to open right now. If they don't do it, I will override the governors." While I agree that houses of worship should be allowed to reopen if they can maintain the same safety protocols that restaurants and retail stores must abide by, I do not agree that the President has the authority to override the governors. General police powers are reserved to the states. And, I am not a fan of the heavy hand of the federal government interfering with state actions, absent a clear violation of federal law.
The DOJ was also threatening both LA City and LA County. In a letter to Mayor Garcetti and the County's Director of Public Health, the DOJ wrote: "Reports of your recent public statements indicate that you suggested the possibility of long-term lockdown of the residents in the City and County of Los Angeles, regardless of the legal justification for such restrictions...Any such approach may be both arbitrary and unlawful." Again, I am not convinced of either the legitimacy or the appropriateness of federal interference with states, counties and cities, absent a violation of federal law.
Speaking of the heavy hand of the federal government, it was recently reported that Lori Laughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, decided to plead guilty in connection with their actions related to the college admissions scandal. The allegation is that the couple paid $500,000 to Rick Singer in order to get their daughters admitted to the University of Southern California. Laughlin pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, and in exchange for the plea is to serve 2 months in prison, pay a fine of $150,000, and perform 100 hours of community service. Her husband pleaded guilty to the same charges, plus honest services wire and mail fraud, in exchange for a 5 month prison term, a fine of $250,000 and 250 hours of community service. I am not sure why the different charges and punishment. But that's not my beef.
What bothers me is that, having committed the act of bribery (through Singer), and falsifying their daughters' involvement in sports, they faced up to 50 years in prison if they went to trial and were convicted on all counts. 50 years in prison for trying to get their daughters admitted to USC? That is outrageous. They were not accused of terrorism or mass murder or running a drug cartel. But, because the feds are able to allege their actions violate various federal laws, each carrying lengthy prison terms, they dared not risk a trial. I am not defending this couple's actions - but I am objecting to the fact that what is essentially a single act can violate numerous laws, allowing the Feds to threaten what amounts to life in prison. What if they were innocent? Could anyone take the risk of a 50 year prison sentence? It is not an answer to say they are only getting 2 and 5 months respectively. Not when the threat of 50 years hangs over their heads.
As of today, the latest numbers I saw showed that the US had 1.68 million cases of coronavirus, with 98,011 deaths. New York and New Jersey combine to have 30.5% of the total cases in the US (360,000 and 153,000, respectively), and 35% of the total deaths (23,282 and 11,081, respectively). Next is Illinois with 108,000 cases and 4,790 deaths, Massachusetts with 91,662 cases and 6,304 deaths, and California with 90,631 cases and 3,708 deaths. LA County, with a quarter of the state's population, had 49.6% of the state's cases (44,988) and 56.7% of the state's deaths (2,104). So, who is to say who knows better on reopening LA? Ultimately, it appears the people will decide.
Sunday, May 17, 2020
The Coronavirus Nine Weeks Later - Did the New York Times Really Publish That?
Some numbers. In the week ending May 9, another 2,981,000 people applied for unemployment. That brings the eight week total to 36,500,000 people. Absolutely frightening. From February to March, retail sales fell 8.3%. From March to April, sales fell 16.4%. According to the 5/16/20 New York Times, the hardest hit segment in retail was clothing stores, down 89% from February to April. Next were furniture stores, down 67%, followed by electronics and appliances down 65%. Food services and drinking establishments were down 50%. Gas stations were down 41%.
In a story out of Bridgeport, Connecticut, we are reminded how these stay at home orders are taking us back to an earlier era. A dairy company had stopped their home deliveries 28 years ago. Now, the request for home delivery is booming, as they deliver milk, eggs, cheese and yogurt. I am sure I am not the only one to remember, as a kid, having a metal milk container outside our door, for the milk delivery man. The container held 4 quart bottles (they were glass bottles back then, with the cream at the top), and we would put the empty bottles back in the container, to be replaced with new ones. The local grocery store would deliver; although, at times my Mom would give me a list which I would give to one of the employees, who would bag it up for me to bring home; and they would add the bill to my Mom's tab. We would also get home delivery of seltzer (my Dad loved it), and kosher meats.
On the good news front, this increased demand for home delivery has resulted in Instacart hiring 30,000 new employees. And 31% of US households purchased groceries online, an increase of 145% from a year earlier. Here are some interesting numbers unrelated to the effects of the coronavirus. At the end of 2018, Chick fil-A was fifth in overall restaurant sales, behind McDonald's, Starbucks, Subway and Taco Bell. By the end of 2019, Chick fil-A's sales increased by $1.3 billion, allowing it to move into third place, behind only McDonald's and Starbucks. Their success is notable not only because they are closed on Sundays; but also because of the (in my opinion) unconstitutional efforts by various local governments to prevent Chick fil-A from opening new outlets. (See prior blog posts.)
As noted in the last post, the states are feeling the pressure from significantly reduced tax revenues. The largest state, California, has the Governor proposing a cut in the states's budget by $6.1 billion. He has also proposed a 10% pay cut for state employees, which is estimated to save about $2.8 billion. Any cut would reverse a long term trend of ever rising budgets.
As of last night, the US was reported to have 1,435,098 cases of coronavirus, with 87,315 deaths. New York was still leading with 358,099 cases and 28,134 deaths, followed by New Jersey with 146,389 cases and 10,260 deaths. Massachusetts was fourth (after Illinois) with 84,933 cases and 5,705 deaths, and Connecticut was twelfth with 36,703 cases and 3,339 deaths. California was fifth, with 78,685 cases and 3,208 deaths. Los Angeles County (with 1/4 of the state's population) far exceeded its proportional share of the cases and deaths - 37,303 and 1,793 respectively.
Los Angeles County has extended its stay at home order for 3 months, according to the County's public health Director. However, it is expected that restrictions will be eased during that time. The Hollywood Bowl has canceled its 2020 concert season. The California State University system, with 23 campuses and over 480,000 undergrads (making it the largest public university in the country) has announced that students will not be allowed on campus for the fall semester. The University of California's 10 campuses are also unlikely to fully reopen. Also on the good news front, Republican Mike Garcia defeated Democrat Christy Smith (56% to 44%) in a special election held to fill the seat in California's 25th Congressional District vacated by Democrat Katie Hill. A Republican taking a Democratic held seat in the very blue state of California is not exactly a common occurrence.
Did the New York Times really publish this? The New York Times seems to be a little defensive over the fact that New York City has had such a high number of cases and deaths: 197,486 cases and 20,214 deaths. The paper has been running a series of Op-Eds and editorials in defense of cities. On May 15, they ran an Op-Ed by Mary Bassett, a professor and Director of the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University. In the piece, she argues that "blaming density for disease (including the coronavirus) is misguided." Ordinarily, I might be surprised by the editors letting this piece make it into the paper or online. But when the agenda calls, facts don't seem to matter. Professor Bassett tells us that "in the United States, over half of the population lives in cities of one million residents or more." Not hardly. The cities with one million or more people include NYC, LA, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose and Austin. 11 cities, with a total population of about 28 million people, in a country of about 330 million people.
Some may say, perhaps she meant "metropolitan areas" and not cities. Perhaps. But rather sloppy for a professor, and for the editors. But then she tells us this: "California and Hawaii, for example, have high population density - but not the highest COVID-19 mortality rates of the states." What? High Population density? Not even in the top ten of states. New Jersey is the mostly densely populated state, with a coronavirus death rate of 107 per 100,000 people. New York, is seventh overall in population density (given the more thinly populated upstate areas), but thanks to densely populated NYC has 140 deaths per 100,000 people. And what about California and Hawaii, cited by Professor Bassett? California is eleventh in density, and has 7 deaths per 100,000. Hawaii is thirteenth in density with 1 death per 100,000. The Northeastern states, NY, NJ, Connecticut, Massachusetts Rhode Island an Pennsylvania - are all far more densely populated and all have far higher rates of death from coronavirus.
I do not question the value of cities, although the politics of many Democratic-led cities is another matter. But, is this really the best argument to be made in support of cities? The message is clear - be wary of what you read, especially if it comes in the form of editorials and Op-Eds in the mainstream media.
In a story out of Bridgeport, Connecticut, we are reminded how these stay at home orders are taking us back to an earlier era. A dairy company had stopped their home deliveries 28 years ago. Now, the request for home delivery is booming, as they deliver milk, eggs, cheese and yogurt. I am sure I am not the only one to remember, as a kid, having a metal milk container outside our door, for the milk delivery man. The container held 4 quart bottles (they were glass bottles back then, with the cream at the top), and we would put the empty bottles back in the container, to be replaced with new ones. The local grocery store would deliver; although, at times my Mom would give me a list which I would give to one of the employees, who would bag it up for me to bring home; and they would add the bill to my Mom's tab. We would also get home delivery of seltzer (my Dad loved it), and kosher meats.
On the good news front, this increased demand for home delivery has resulted in Instacart hiring 30,000 new employees. And 31% of US households purchased groceries online, an increase of 145% from a year earlier. Here are some interesting numbers unrelated to the effects of the coronavirus. At the end of 2018, Chick fil-A was fifth in overall restaurant sales, behind McDonald's, Starbucks, Subway and Taco Bell. By the end of 2019, Chick fil-A's sales increased by $1.3 billion, allowing it to move into third place, behind only McDonald's and Starbucks. Their success is notable not only because they are closed on Sundays; but also because of the (in my opinion) unconstitutional efforts by various local governments to prevent Chick fil-A from opening new outlets. (See prior blog posts.)
As noted in the last post, the states are feeling the pressure from significantly reduced tax revenues. The largest state, California, has the Governor proposing a cut in the states's budget by $6.1 billion. He has also proposed a 10% pay cut for state employees, which is estimated to save about $2.8 billion. Any cut would reverse a long term trend of ever rising budgets.
As of last night, the US was reported to have 1,435,098 cases of coronavirus, with 87,315 deaths. New York was still leading with 358,099 cases and 28,134 deaths, followed by New Jersey with 146,389 cases and 10,260 deaths. Massachusetts was fourth (after Illinois) with 84,933 cases and 5,705 deaths, and Connecticut was twelfth with 36,703 cases and 3,339 deaths. California was fifth, with 78,685 cases and 3,208 deaths. Los Angeles County (with 1/4 of the state's population) far exceeded its proportional share of the cases and deaths - 37,303 and 1,793 respectively.
Los Angeles County has extended its stay at home order for 3 months, according to the County's public health Director. However, it is expected that restrictions will be eased during that time. The Hollywood Bowl has canceled its 2020 concert season. The California State University system, with 23 campuses and over 480,000 undergrads (making it the largest public university in the country) has announced that students will not be allowed on campus for the fall semester. The University of California's 10 campuses are also unlikely to fully reopen. Also on the good news front, Republican Mike Garcia defeated Democrat Christy Smith (56% to 44%) in a special election held to fill the seat in California's 25th Congressional District vacated by Democrat Katie Hill. A Republican taking a Democratic held seat in the very blue state of California is not exactly a common occurrence.
Did the New York Times really publish this? The New York Times seems to be a little defensive over the fact that New York City has had such a high number of cases and deaths: 197,486 cases and 20,214 deaths. The paper has been running a series of Op-Eds and editorials in defense of cities. On May 15, they ran an Op-Ed by Mary Bassett, a professor and Director of the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University. In the piece, she argues that "blaming density for disease (including the coronavirus) is misguided." Ordinarily, I might be surprised by the editors letting this piece make it into the paper or online. But when the agenda calls, facts don't seem to matter. Professor Bassett tells us that "in the United States, over half of the population lives in cities of one million residents or more." Not hardly. The cities with one million or more people include NYC, LA, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose and Austin. 11 cities, with a total population of about 28 million people, in a country of about 330 million people.
Some may say, perhaps she meant "metropolitan areas" and not cities. Perhaps. But rather sloppy for a professor, and for the editors. But then she tells us this: "California and Hawaii, for example, have high population density - but not the highest COVID-19 mortality rates of the states." What? High Population density? Not even in the top ten of states. New Jersey is the mostly densely populated state, with a coronavirus death rate of 107 per 100,000 people. New York, is seventh overall in population density (given the more thinly populated upstate areas), but thanks to densely populated NYC has 140 deaths per 100,000 people. And what about California and Hawaii, cited by Professor Bassett? California is eleventh in density, and has 7 deaths per 100,000. Hawaii is thirteenth in density with 1 death per 100,000. The Northeastern states, NY, NJ, Connecticut, Massachusetts Rhode Island an Pennsylvania - are all far more densely populated and all have far higher rates of death from coronavirus.
I do not question the value of cities, although the politics of many Democratic-led cities is another matter. But, is this really the best argument to be made in support of cities? The message is clear - be wary of what you read, especially if it comes in the form of editorials and Op-Eds in the mainstream media.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)