It should surprise no one that only 26% of Israelis say they would favor a two-state solution. (Per a 10/26 Gallup poll.) The real surprise is why anyone would favor a two-state solution, especially after 10/7. After all, the Hamas leaders said they plan on carrying out further 10/7 style attacks over and over and over again. And let's not forget the 10/7 attack targeted civilians. Most analysts agree that the timing of this attack was meant to dissuade Saudi Arabia from joining the Abraham Accords, as the Saudis seemed to be inching torward joining. And let's not forget the purpose of terrorism. It is to terrorize a population.
A study by the National Mental Health Barometer in Israel found that 15% of the population personally knew someone killed or injured on 10/7. Compare that to 9/11 here, with only 4% of Americans knowing someone killed or injured. That's nearly 4 times more for Israelis. And what about the psychological effects of 10/7? 32% of women ages 18 to 35 were found to have impaired functioning, as was 20% of the overall population. 20%! 1 in 5! Symptoms include anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress. Nearly one-third of the population were found to be clinically diagnosed with depression, anxiety or PTSD. 50% said that 10/7 affected their leisure activities. 35% expressed difficulty in forming and maintaining close relationships. But none of this is of any concern to Senator Van Hollen.
As one Fatah official said: "We know the trap we have set for Israel by demanding a two-state solution." This official claimed that within 20 years of having a state, the Palestinians could have an aircraft industry and industrial sector capable of rivaling Israel's. At that point: "In my view, the establishment of a Palestinian state would mean the disappearance of the Israeli entity, and the end of global Zionism." I have no idea why anyone actually believes the conflict with the Palestinians is about land. I have repeatedly explained that the Arabs were killing Jews in the British Mandate area in the 1920's. A part of that land later became Israel. A larger part of that land became Jordan. And the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem sided with Hitler and against the United States during WWII. He wanted to have Hitler help him with the Final Solution - against the Jews in the Mandate. Before there was an Israel. Nothing has changed. Hamas is aiming for the Final Solution still, and that was the purpose of 10/7/23. 10/7 was the true genocide.
Van Hollen is setting the table for how he believes all Democrats must treat Israel. "The next Democratic president should recognize a state of Palestine that is subject to clear benchmarks, including free and fair elections...the United States should treat Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, as part of Palestine." Sure, what a great idea. In the last election, 2007, the people of Gaza elected Hamas as their government. They have had no further elections. And the West Bank? Abbas was elected in 2005 to a four year term, and has held no further elections since.
How is this for a threat against our major ally in the Middle East, and one of our best allies in the world: "Moving forward will not be easy. It will place the United States on a collision course with any Israeli government opposed to a Palestinian state." Only an insane Israeli leader would consider agreeing to a Palestinian state on both their east and southwest borders. This ass Van Hollen really does not care how many Israelis are killed. Or if Israel continues to exist. And, he maligns AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), made up up Jewish Americans who support Israel, along with Christians who also support Israel, for having the nerve to support the one Jewish state in the world.
And, he tells the rank and file Democratic voters what to expect. And he warns any Democrat what their stance about Israel needs to be. "Primary voters won't trust any Democratic Presidential candidate who does not have a record of moral and strategic clarity on these issues, especially if, as a legislator, he or she voted to send Mr. Netanyahu bombs even as his government imposed a total blockade on Gaza...nor will they support a candidaate who plans to re-enlist the senior Democratic decision makers who whitewashed the truth during the Biden administration and refuse to acknowledge their complicity."
Wow! Would Van Hollen like to send former Biden Administration officials to re-education camps? Like in the Soviet Union or Communist China? Total blockade on Gaza? Liar! If so, how does Hamas manage to get all the automatic weapons, rockets, and all the material to build hundreds of miles of underground tunnels, allowing them to sneak into Israel in order to kill and kidnap Jews. Total blockade? Liar! Hundreds of tons of food have gotten into Gaza, thanks to Israel. What other country feeds the population of a country that is trying to annihilate them?
And the threat to other Democrats is clear - support the Palestinians and oppose Israel, or else. To say that he is encouraging Democrats to be aggressively anti-Israel is a gross understatement. But I'm curious. In what way has Hamas been an ally of the United States? In what way have the Palestinians been allies of the United States? Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter if Israel is a great ally of ours. What is important - hate the Jews.
(Note. I said I would say a few words about Van Hollen speaking at DAWN. And I also have a few words about other Democrats. Please see Part III.)