Is Anyone Really Surprised?

You might think that in the year 2025, we'd be past this.  But we're not.  And how could anyone be surprised.  On college and university campuses we've seen and heard the pro-Hamas demonstrations.  We've heard the shouts:  "From the river to the sea."  What does everyone think that means?  It means no more Israel and no more Jews.  How about "Globalize the intifada."  The two intifadas in Israel resulted in the deaths of thousands of Jews, as a result of nonstop terrorist attacks by the Palestinians.  So, "globalize" it?  Start killing Jews everywhere around the world?  That's what just happened, isn't it?  

We have anti-American and anti-Israel professors around the country funded by the likes of Qatar and Saudi Arabia and the CCP.  We had university presidents testify before Congress that calling for the genocide of the Jewish people might be acceptable, depending on the context.  What context would that be?  You weak-kneed bastards succumbed to a little pressure from your pro-Hamas students and faculty.  This is the crumbling of Western civilization.  At the graduation ceremony at Columbia University this week, University President Claire Shipman's prepared speech had this line:  "I know many in our community are mourning the absence of our graduate, Mahmoud Khalil."  

Are you kidding me?  Mourning?  He's not dead.  Trump is trying to get him deported.  (See my two posts about Khalil on March 15, 2025, "Mahmoud Khalil Must Be Deported," and April 2, 2025, "More About Mahmoud Khalil".)  Khalil was the leader of the pro-Hamas demonstrations at Columbia.  Did Shipman have any concern about how the Jewish students might feel about that comment?  Why would she, when the only important students are the pro-Hamas ones - many of whom are not American citizens. 

This past Monday we had three major Western countries, the U.K., France and Canada, issue a joint statement condemning Israel, and calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state.  As I sit here, I'm thinking I would not be disappointed if France and the U.K. fell to Germany, but for the impact it would have had on the Jewish citizens of those countries.  Because their leaders are MORONS!  Thankfully, we still have a presidential administration in this country that does believe in western civilization.  Mike Huckabee is the U.S. Ambassador to Israel.  He said that in WWII, the U.K. and France did not seek a "tie" in their war with Germany.  They "bombed the heck out of Germany and that's what ended the war.  It was a decisive victory."  Well, with U.S. help, of course.   

Huckabee:  "The prolonged suffering for everybody is on Hamas.  And I'm outraged that the U.K., Canada and France, they're blaming the wrong (party).  They need to start putting the pressure on Hamas."  Imagine if, in WWII, the U.S. said to the U.K. and France:  "You need to stop bombing Germany.  You need to stop fighting the Germans.  Just let them establish an expanded state on whatever land they want."  

You many not believe this.  But you should.  Liora Rez is the Founder and Executive Director of an organization called StopAntisemitism.  She was recently on Fox discussing what happened at the University of Illinois campus.  She said that stickers were put up around the campus.  What did those stickers say?  "Exterminate the Zionists."  Make no mistake, the Leftists and the pro-Hamas crowd make no distinction between Zionists and Jews.  (Every Jew should be a Zionist, in my opinion.)  We are now seeing constant calls for the genocide of the Jews in the year 2025 in the United States of America.  Of course, Ms. Rez's organization contacted both the Mayor's office and the university officials.  What did they reply to her?  Nothing!  They never replied!  

Yaron Lischinsky, age 30, was about to propose to Sarah Milgrim, age 26, when the two of them were gunned down by a cowardly terrorist (imagine all the worst curse words you can, and they will still be insufficient to describe my feelings about the perpetrator) on Wednesday evening outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C.  Like many, I again found myself both sad and angry.  Yaron was a Christian born in Germany who had moved to Israel.  His father was Jewish  and his mother Christian.  Sarah was an American and a Jew, who grew up in the suburbs of Kansas City.  They worked at the Israeli embassy in D.C.  As is my practice, I refuse to name the evil shooter.  But he said he shot these two young people for Gaza.  That's a joke.  The rulers of Gaza, Hamas, have made it very clear that they don't give a damn about the people of Gaza.  And, as the shooter was led away, he was shouting "free free Palestine."  Free Palestine from what?  Free Gaza from Hamas if you want to see an end to the constant wars.

The Jew hating antisemites have been out in force since the cold blooded terror attack on Yaron and Sarah.  One 19 year old punk referred to the victims as "war criminals."  He knows nothing.  But if he agrees to move permanently to Gaza, I'll raise money for his flight.  Then we have a so-called journalist who writes for the BBC, saying that Jews should be burned "as Hitler did."  Then there is this gem someone (not in support) posted on LinkedIn:  "Natural logic:  when governments fail to hold Israel accountable for an actual holocaust being committed before our very eyes, no genocidal Zionist should be safe anywhere in the world."  Just another way to say "globalize the intifada."

Interesting how they accuse the Jews of what they actually say and do.  Hamas calls for the end of Israel.  Hamas says they will commit another attack like 10/7 over and over and over again - until all the Jews are dead.  But when the Jews defend themselves, somehow then we are committing genocide.  These people want to bring about an end to western civilization, to the Judeo-Christian basis for western societies.  Some in the West are only to happy to accommodate them.  Perhaps out of fear.  Perhaps out of self-loathing.  But the rest of us better stand up and speak out.  Or the evil-doers will win out.       

...and the Ugly

Qatar offered to give Trump a jumbo 747-8 plane, described as a luxury palace in the sky, which would serve as Air Force One.  Thereafter, the plane would go to Trump's presidential library, and maybe even be available for his personal use.  Trump has been annoyed at Boeing as they are apparently behind in finishing the two new jumbo jets that are intended to replace the current aging Air Force One.  I hope that Congress is investigating why there has been such a delay.

Trump said only a "stupid person" would refuse the offer.  "They're giving us a free jet...I could say 'no, no, no, don't give us - I want to pay you, $1 billion, or $400 million, or whatever it is.  Or I could say thank you very much."  Seriously, President Trump?  In what might be described as a major understatement, Senator Ted Cruz said the plane "poses significant espionage and surveillance problems."  I cannot imagine the DOD and the Secret Service ever approving the use of that plane as AF1.  Even if the plane was taken apart piece by piece, and stripped down to the bare bones, who knows what electronic devices, or worse, may have been embedded in the various parts.  Every little piece would have to be x-rayed and scanned.

Here was the conservative New York Post:  "Sorry, this 'gift' is far from free; Qatar will surely expect something in return."  No doubt.  The Post:  "...it creates all kinds of conflicts of interest and runs smack into the Constitution's Emoluments Clause, which prohibits foreign gifts."  Said the Wall Street Journal:  "If the emir calls the White House to share his views on Iran, Israel and the region, won't he expect the President to pick up the phone?  Should voters even have to wonder?  It demeans the presidency to have a foreign government handing out such a valuable gift to America's elected leader."  Not to mention that Qatar has already said they do not want the U.S. to use our base there to attack Iran.

Here's something else that bothers me.  Remember when Biden was VP and then president, and during those times he and his family seemed to have ongoing business concerns in Europe and with China.  I didn't like any of it.  Most of my fellow conservatives did not like it either.  Well, this is no different when it comes to the Trump family.  I don't care that Trump's holdings may be in a blind trust.  His sons are running the family companies.  We clearly need some federal legislation to deal with this.

There needs to be a law preventing not only the president and vice-president, but all cabinet members and others high up in an administration (and their family members), from conducting overseas business  while they hold office.  All of these officials should be serving the American people, and only the American people.  There should never be any doubt about that.  But doesn't the Emoluments Clause in the Constitution already cover this?  I do not know the extent to which it might cover a federal official from doing business in foreign countries, as the clause refers to foreign governments.

It was never clear to me why Steve Witkoff was flying all over acting as Trump's envoy, when we have a Secretary of State to do that job.  According to the New York Post:  "Qatar spent $643 million in a leveraged buyout to bail out Witkoff and his partners in a New York hotel project."  Are we supposed to feel good about that?  I don't.

And, it hits closer to home.  The Post article continued:  "Eric Trump signed a $5.5 billion deal with a Qatari company to build a golf club and villas 40 miles north of Doha...and it's expected to net millions for the Trump clan."  I hope that everybody agrees that this is entirely unacceptable.  It was unacceptable, at least to the conservatives I know, when Biden seemed to be selling access and influence when he held office.  And while I'm sure those on the Left will agree with me now, many simply made excuses for Biden and his family at the time Biden was in office.  

But it all needs to stop.  And if this president or the next one were to veto such legislation, then I would expect sufficient votes in Congress to override any such veto.  Anyone in Congress not willing to do so, should not be reelected.  Yes, that's how strongly I fell about protecting the integrity of the federal government.  

The Bad...

That was quite a whirlwind tour of the Middle East - Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE.  But before arriving in Saudi Arabia, Trump made a deal with the Houthis, the terrorist group in Yemen.  If they stopped attacking U.S. ships in the Gulf, he would stop bombing them.  It was disappointing to see that Trump did not insist on the Houthis ceasing their missile attacks on Israel as part of the deal.  And Israel was neither invited to any of the meetings with the various Arab leaders, nor was Israel one of the countries visited by Trump.

In Saudi Arabia, there was Trump signing a $600 billion investment deal with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS).  The arms deal was worth $142 billion.  And, it certainly looks as if Trump is willing to allow the Saudis to develop civilian use of nuclear energy.  Yes, the U.S. has a long history with the Saudis.  We protected them, and they provided cheap oil to us.  But, I can't help but feeling torn over this.  The Saudis were said to have had a hand in 9/11.  And they have exported their radical Wahhabism (part of Sunni Islam) to the US and to our educational system.  

Under MBS, Saudi control over their population has eased slightly.  And Trump did say some things I would expect any U.S. president to say.  "I stood here envisioning a Middle East that would eradicate terrorism and extremism, rising as one of the world's proudest, most prosperous and successful regions."  And Trump said he would like to see Saudi Arabia in the Abraham Accords, but said to MBS:  "you'll do it in your own time."  

I wish he had said something like this:  "I hope you will not delay in joining the Abraham Accords.  It is no secret that Hamas carried out their attacks against Israel on 10/7 in order to affect your decision.  Hamas knew that Israel would have to retaliate in a significant way.  The damage to Gaza, the deaths of their fellow Arabs - your fellow Arabs - means nothing to them.  By delaying your participation in the Abraham Accords, it only encourages Hamas to keep fighting, to the detriment of the people of Gaza.  Once you join the Accords, Hamas will have lost the backing of the most important of the Gulf Arab countries."

Trump said to MBS:  "I like visiting with you...I really believe we like each other a lot."  As I recall watching that, MBS sat there expressionless.  I dislike those types of comments.  It reminded me of George W. Bush saying:  "I looked the man (Putin) in the eye.  I found him very straightforward and trustworthy - I was able to get a sense of his soul."  No Bush!  No Trump!  Don't mistake these men for who they are.  If you believe that making deals with them is in America's interest, that's one thing.  But don't fawn over them.  And definitely do not be obsequious.  

A similar comment was made by Trump about the new leader of Syria, Ahmad al-Sharaa, who was in Saudi Arabia.  Trump described him as a "tough guy.  Strong past.  Very strong past.  Fighter."  Why?  Al-Sharaa was part of Al-Qaeda.  But Trump did say they have a lot of work to do in Syria, and hopes they will then join the Abraham Accords also.  In order to encourage movement in that direction, Trump announced that he was lifting sanctions on Syria.  

Then Trump went to Qatar.  Yes, Qatar is home to the forward base (Al Udeid Air Base) of the U.S. Central Command, which is headquartered in Florida.  Trump also signed deals with the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani.  Qatar pledged to purchase up to 210 Boeing aircraft (787's and 777x's), valued at $96 billion.  Perhaps most concerning is the agreement for Qatar to purchase the MQ-9B reaper drones/pilotless aircraft, as well as advanced counter-drone capabilities.  

Let's not be naive.  Qatar provides perhaps the major source of funding for Hamas.  The same Hamas that killed and took as hostages American citizens.  Qatar has also provided a safe haven for the leaders of Hamas.  Guess who funds and controls anti-Israel and anti-America news organization (propaganda machine) Al Jazeera?  That would be Qatar.  Then we have vast amounts of money that Qatar sends to our colleges and universities in support of anti-American and anti-Israel "student" organizations.  And we've seen the type of effects that has had in our most elite universities.  Let me put this as clearly as possible:  Qatar supports terrorism!

Will these deals with Saudi Arabia and Qatar have a moderating influence on their governments?  Their governments are not democratically elected - they are monarchies.  But, Mike - we became friends with Germany and Japan after WWII.  Yes, we did.  After we defeated them in war, and they were basically at our mercy.  I understand the hope that having good economic relations may lead to less wars and less tension in the Middle East.  But that's a hope.  It does not appear that Trump insisted on any moderating concessions out of Saudi Arabia and Qatar.  Will economic relations alone be enough to moderate these two countries?  I do believe that economic relations can have beneficial effects on countries that are not considered to be free market economies.  Or democratically free.  In any event, insisting on political change has not usually worked.  

The Good...

I have to imagine that it's no surprise to anyone the speed at which things are happening in the second Trump Administration.  However, before I get to the events of this past week, let's have a brief recap of the first nearly 4 months of Trump's second term.

After Biden lied multiple times that he was unable to secure the southern border without Congressional action, and after his Secretary of Homeland Security, Mayorkas, lied multiple times and told the American people that the border was secure - Trump was able to significantly secure the border in a matter of weeks.  Southwest border crossings totaled 137,473 in March, 2024.  In March, 2025 that number was 7,181.  Still too many, but a huge drop off.  I have no doubt that Trump and Homan will continue to get those numbers lower.

I understand the concerns people have about masked ICE agents forcibly snatching people off the street.  And, I read about the 19 year old Georgia college student who is currently in ICE custody.  Her parents brought her here when she was 4 years old.  Where would she be deported to?  The U.S. is the only country she knows.  On the other hand, I have to ask what efforts she made to become a citizen.  If she is given leniency, which I do not oppose, I would expect that she would have to comply with significant court orders.

Trump set up DOGE, and has reduced the size of the federal bureaucracy.  Has it gone too far at times?  Yes.  But he is not the only President who has tried to reduce the size of the federal government, and in the process cut federal spending.  

What about DEI?  I have previously expressed my opinion that DEI is evil.  It supports racism and antisemitism.  And it encourages people to view the world immorally - not through the lens of right and wrong.  Rather, Black vs White, oppressed vs oppressors, and so on.  I'm happy to see the executive order ending it.  But, the Executive Order may have gone too far when it also eliminated "accessibility."  Disabled people should have access, whether or not they are favored.  But if a disabled person is qualified for a job, they should not be denied that because of being in a wheelchair.  

Biological men competing in women's sports?  Title IX was supposed to protect women's sports.  But a more favored small minority always seems to get priority for the Left.  I am not unsympathetic to people who may feel they were born into the wrong sex.  But that does not mean they get to upend a system that has long been in place.  And, if they remain with male genitalia, they should definitely not be sharing a locker room with biological females.  Of course, all this used to be considered common sense.  And if they are such a small minority, schools should be able to make some accommodation allowing them to change into and out of gym clothes privately.

Trump, as in his first term, issued another executive order intended to combat antisemitism.  Said the order:  "These attacks (of October 7, 2023) unleashed an unprecedented wave of vile antisemitic discrimination, vandalism, and violence against our citizens, especially in our schools and on our campuses."  While some say the order takes away free speech, I disagree.  Obviously, citizens can still say whatever they want about government policy (with very few limitations).  The issue is what can visa holders and green card holders say.  I have commented twice on Mahmoud Khalil.  He not only wants to see the end of Israel, he wants to see the end of America.  And he openly interfered with American citizens at Columbia being able to study and get to their classes.

I don't get it.  He is a guest in our country.  For those on the Left:  imagine I was invited into your house and "occupied" your bedroom and bathroom, and denied access to you.  And imagine I said horrible things to you and about you.  And accused you of oppressing people who are different from you in some way.  What would you do?  You would call the police to get me the hell out of your house.  Well, I want ICE to get someone like Khalil the hell out of our country.  If you're a guest, act like it!   

I have not agreed with everything Trump has said or done.  I criticized his unfair attacks on Zelenskyy.  I disagreed with eliminating all of USAID.  And, as noted above, sometimes the executive orders are taken too far.  The DOD web site had a page about the military service of Jackie Robinson.  They removed it.  Then, under pressure, they restored it.  The idea is not to rewrite history.  That's what the Soviets did.  The idea is to learn from it.  A similar thing happened at the National Park Service, when they removed, then restored, a quote from Harriet Tubman about the underground railroad.  That's part of our history.  Learn from these things, and understand that we should all be treated equally.  And, as MLK Jr. said - judged on the content of our character, not the color of our skin (or our religion or ethnic background).   

I Am Both A Proud American, And A Proud Jew And Supporter Of Israel

Following the terrorist assault by Hamas against Israel on 10/7/23, a number of Jewish actors have been speaking out in defense of Israel and the Jewish people.  It has been my opinion that it is imperative for all Jews to speak out against the rising Jew hatred and Israel hatred following 10/7.  One actor, in particular, has been quite forceful in speaking out, and that is Michael Rapaport.  Acknowledging that his public support for Israel has cost him to lose acting jobes, he said "I don't have the slightest bit of regret." 

"There was no choice...Being supportive of Jews, being supportive of Israel, being supportive of our people was not a choice.  It was, and is, very organic to me."  Which raises an imteresting issue for those of us who are Jewish.  Is our Judaism something with which we identify only in rebuttal to the antisemites?  Or is it an important part of our lives?  Part of our self-identity?  

I have repeatedly said in the blog that antiseitism must always be fought, whether it comes from the Left, the Right, or radical Islam.  Without rebuttal, we risk letting it spread and grow.  I came across an article about a Pastor who has a podcast.  And he is quite antisemitic.  Here is something he said:  "Jews in the Biblical sense, right, they do not exist today anymore, right?...It's only Christians and non-Christians."  

Here are a couple of questions for this Pastor.  How do you explain the fact that Jews around the world have just finished celebrating the holiday of Passover (the story of the Jewish people's Exodus from Egypt)?  How do you explain that Jews everywhere celebrate Passover at the same time, and say the same prayers?  How do you explain that Jews have been celebrating Passover for over 3000 years?  Not the Jews of the Bible?  Really?  This false assertion is just a way for the antisemites to deny the Jewish people's connection to the land of Israel. 

Professor Gil Troy had an interesting article in the April 4-10, 2025 edition of the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles.  Quoting a Rabbi Nolan Lebovitz, we hear:  "I am a Jew grateful to have been born and raised here in America.  I pledge allegiance to our flag of the United States of America.  I also recognize my shared connection to Jews everywhere.  The Jewish people is my ancestry, and it's my extended family.  As part of the Jewish people, I maintain a loyalty to the Jewish state, the State of Israel."

I agree with Rabbi Lebovitz.  It is no secret to readers of this blog about my feelings for America.  Nor is it any secret about my feelings for the State of Israel.  Dual loyalty?  No more than millions of other Americans.  Those who proudly identify as Italian Americans or Irish Americans or African Americans are rarely accused of dual loyalty.  Are Catholic Americans accused of dual loyalty to the Pope and the Church?  But "dual loyalty" is simply another unfounded accusation thrown at the Jews, usually by antisemites.

My Judaism has always been important to me.  Not just as a rebuttal to the antisemites.  I have enjoyed going to religious services.  I have found it to be meaningful personally.  And, as I have, of late, attended services at Chabad, I will say that I have found the Chabad Rabbis to deliver sermons that are particularly inspiring and meaningful.

But what about leftwing Jews?  I ask that becuse I have had a long running disagreement with another Jewish friend, who is also politically conservative, about his attitudes toward leftwing Jews.  He feels no greater affinity for those Jews than he does for others who are on the Left.  And he has no particular affinity for people on the Left.  

I'm with Rabbi Lebovitz, and all the Chabad Rabbis that I know.  Rabbi Lebovitz:  "Our defining American Jewish mission must be to cultivate our sense of peoplehood...We must see our fellow Jews as our family, as our priority."  Of course, given my politically conservative outlook, it does not mean that I never struggle with my allegiance to all of the Jewish people.  But I have done my best to support and identify with the Jewish people everywhere.  Notwithstanding how much I may argue with some of them, or want to give some a klop on the side of their head.     

A Reply to the Last Three Comments on the Blog

Each of my last 3 posts has a comment by "Anonymous."  As the comments were all written within a short time frame, I'm assuming the same person wrote all 3 comments.  I have a reply to some parts of those comments.

In the first post ("It's Time To Replace Musk At DOGE," 3/27/25), anonymous asserts that he has not seen any evidence of fraud and abuse, that it's "bs."  Is that a joke?  A quick Google search took me to the US GAO.  "As of December 31, 2024, the Department of Justice has publicly announced criminal fraud-related charges involving pandemic-relief progams against at least 3,096 defendants - which can be individuals or entities."  That took no time to find.  And that's over 3000 criminal complaints from just a single, time-limited government program.  You will also note, anonymous, that the ending date is 12/31/24, when Biden was still President.   

In the second post ("More About Mahmoud Khalil," 4/2/25), anonymous says that it is "disconcerting that the doctor and Khalil push such hateful agendas."  Other than the understatement, I agree.  He then says the best way to deal with such speech is "to rebut them publically in a big way."  First, if you would like to comment further, anonymous, I would like to know what you specifically have done to "rebut them publically in a big way."  And while I agree that is the proper approach for rebutting an American citizen, I don't agree that should be the approach for non-citizens.

Not when we have another option - deporting them.  American citizens are given the right to speak their minds under our First Amenment.  I'm a big believer in it.  But why in the world would we allow someone who has been given the privilege of coming to our country with a visa or green card, the opportunity to spew hate speech against Americans, to speak against the foreign policy of our duly elected government, and most shockingly - call for the overthrow of our government.  Are you really suggesting, anonymous, that our only recourse against foreigners who call for the destruction of our country is to "rebut them publically in a big way?"  

What if someone broke into your home, and declared that they not only had the right to be there, but that they also should be able to "overthrow" (evict) the exisiting residents - you and your family.  Would you really say that the proper way to deal with them would be to speak out publicly against them?   Because I'm willing to bet that you would call the police and ask the police to kick them the hell out.    

In the last post ("Do You Have Remorse Having Voted For Trump?", 4/4/25), I am faced with a rather lengthy diatribe by anonymous.  First, Anonymous tells me that I should give examples of "woke or DEI."  Well, I hate to repeat myself, so I won't.  Please reread the post, anonymous, for some examples.  Anonymous says that I am greatly exaggerating the number of criminals who have entered the country illegally.  I have never understood that argument.  One criminal entering the country illegally is too many.  We have enough of our own home grown criminals already.  But I am glad to see that anonymous agrees that criminal aliens should be deported.  (I won't discuss here whether everyone who enters the country illegally is, by definition, a criminal.)

Customs and Border Protection reports the following numbers during the Biden Administration.  Fiscal Year 2021, 10,763, FY 2022 12,028, FY 2023 15,267 and FY 2024 17,048.  That's "only" 55,106 criminal illegal aliens.  Not too many for you, anonymous?  But it turns out that those people have already been convicted of a crime.  The US House of Representatives reported that 1.9 million illegal aliens during Biden's term were "gotaways."  Who are they?  Gang members?  Cartel members?  Human traffickers?  Drug traffickers?  Shouldn't we want to know?

It is insanity to have an open border policy, where we do not vet every single person coming into the country.  I appreciate Anonymous saying that immigrants are needed to work in the farm and hopitality industries, and that we need a system to allow for "these folks to work here legally."  But in the meantime, do we allow them in without knowing who they are, and let employers pay them low wages?  I have advocated for decades that Congress needs to address the issue of "legal" immigration, so that we get the people in who will be a benefit to the United States.  That does not seem to be happening.

I'll end with 2 issues I will not address here, other than to say, I did not address either one these issues (tariffs and the trans population), so I am not sure how they came up in your comment.  

"Do You Have Remorse Having Voted For Trump?"

This question was recently posed to me.  I immediately replied "no remorse."  Why would I have remorse?  Let's think about it.  Had Harris won, I would not have agreed with her on anything.  Giving her the benefit of the doubt, maybe I would have agreed with between 1% and 5%.  With Trump, let's say for the sake of argument, that I would only agree with 80% to 90%.  Would anybody prefer to see a candidate completely opposed to their views, actually win?  Who would?

But what about Trump?  Let's see.  When I refer to Biden, I am also referring to Harris, inasmuch as she said she would not change any of Biden's policies if she won.  Under Biden, approximately 10 million people entered the country illegally.  Why don't Democrats see giving up on our sovereignty as a threat to our democray?  Not to mention, these millions were not properly vetted.  So we had gangbangers, cartel members, human traffickers, drug traffickers and various other criminals coming into our country.  But they weren't all criminals, right?  Irrelevant.  If you have wide open borders you do not have a country.  Undder Trump we will have no more than 400,000 illegals in 4 years; and that is a high estimate as the border continues to get more secure.

Under Biden, the culture turned increasingly - I'll be polite - wacky.  We were filled with woke nonsense and DEI nonsense.  Things such as a man can get pregnant.  Biological boys/men changing in girls/womens locker rooms, and competeing in girls/womens sports.  A Supreme Court nominee not being able to tell us the definition of a woman.  And let's not forget the emphasis on "identity politics."  Or, as Biden said to a black crowd when he was running in 2020 - "If you don't know who to vote for then you ain't black."  Racist, and demeaning to blacks.  Did Biden say "ain't" when speaking to a white crowd?  And, let's not forget the targeting of parents at local school board meetings, for daring to insist on knowing what was being taught to their kids.   

Here's something I'll never understand.  Biden allowed countless criminals into the country.  Trump is rounding them up and deporting them.  But Democrats are objecting.  They're objecting!  Would they like to see their wives and daughters raped?  Or murdered?  For those who believe in open borders, why do they have locks on their doors?  Or live in gated communities?

Other presidents have talked about reducing the federal deficit and balancing the budget.  But Trump, through the Department of Government Efficicency (DOGE) is actually doing something.  Yes, I expressed some concerns about Musk and DOGE in my 3/27 post.  But who can complain about getting rid of fraud, waste and abuse in government? 

Trump wants us to be energy independent.  He also wants us to return to self-sufficency in manufacturing.  Hence, the tariffs.  Generally, I prefer free trade.  But why shouldn't it be fair trade?  Back in  June, 1996, someone we all know was speaking to Congress.  She talked about the US having a $35 billion trade deficit in 1995.  We were told then that the average MFN (Most Favored Nation) tariff we placed on Chinese goods was 2%.  China had a 35% tariff on US goods.  

And we were told that only 2% of US exports were allowed into China.  However, 33% of Chinese goods were allowed into the US.  The speaker estimated that this trade imbalance supported 10,000,000 Chinese jobs, compared to only 170,000 US jobs.  The speaker went on to implore her fellow House menbers to tell the President that the trade relationship with China is a job loser for the US.  If you haven't yet guessed, that speaker was none other than Nancy Pelosi.